Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Thyroid Levels are Good!
Friday, February 24, 2012
Thyroid Still Not Fixed
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Clinic Visit Outcome
Monday, February 13, 2012
Kalydeco!
The downside is that Kalydeco is only approved for some people with CF, people with the G551D mutation who are six and older. Clinical trials have shown that the drug is a miracle for these people, but that it is not for people who have the most common mutation. Thankfully, there are two drugs in the pipeline that are addressing the most common mutation. So there is so much hope in the CF world right now!
So, now for what I have been doing - researching, researching, and more researching. I have the R117H gene, and the moment I saw the phrase that Kalydeco is a potentiator of the R117H mutation, I started trying to learn everything I could about how the drug might work on my mutation. Might this be a cure for my CF??? Might this stop the night sweats, the coughing, the post nasal drip, the days where I just feel like crap, the pulmonary episodes, the sinus infections, etc.? Might this mean that I no longer have to worry: "Will I meet my grandchildren?" "When am I going to start needing regular hospitalizations, and how will that affect my family?" "Should I bother to save for retirement?"
Based on everything I have read, I think I have a lot of reason to have hope. And last week, I almost died of shock and excitement when I learned two things: Kalydeco is a pregnancy category B drug! This means I could potentially take it during pregnancy and nursing and not worry so much about getting sick. AND, my insurance claims they will cover it off label! I especially could not believe the second one, considering the medication costs $294,000 per year. Holy.freaking.cow.
So now to the next step - asking my doctor for his help. I have gathered all of my research, printed it and done some highlighting, and this is what it boils down to:
-The cause of CF is that certain ions are not processed correctly in cells. One of the problems is with an ion channel, which Kalydeco addresses. It is the first drug that directly fixes the CAUSE of CF, not just the symptoms of thick sticky mucus, inflammation, infection, digestive issues, etc.
-In vitro studies have shown that Kalydeco also increases channel gating in many other gating mutations. These studies have been published. Based on these studies alone, the pharmaceutical company (Vertex) is requesting that Kalydeco be approved for ALL gating mutations in Europe. If I had one of these gating mutations, I'd probably be knocking down my doctor's door trying to get it off label.
-My mutation, R117H, is classified as a "Conductance Mutation." HOWEVER, I've read two sources that say the primary problem with my mutation is actually channel gating, not conductance (although there is reduced conductance).
-The in-vitro data for R117H has not been published. But it is good enough that Vertex announced they are going to begin clinical trials for my mutation this year (I whooped like I was watching football when I read that announcement!). I do not qualify for the trials because my lung function is too high.
-I know someone who has a contact at Vertex, and they sent this in an email:
"The answer to that question is that Vertex has not yet tested the effect of Kalydeco in people with the R117H genotype. However, based on testing on airway epithelial cells from patients with that genotype, we believe that Kalydeco could have a similar effect to that seen in individuals with the G551D genotype. We hope to study the effect of Kalydeco on individuals with this and other genotypes in the near future."
I called Vertex and asked about the in vitro results for R117H. They said my doctor would have to call for that information. I am planning to ask him to call, and if the results are similar to those for the gating mutations, I am hoping he will consider prescribing it off-label. I am very excited and nervous for the appointment, because I have dying to get ahold of the in vitro results for almost a year.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Results
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Back to the RE!
So I decided to make an appointment with the RE, and I am so glad I did! He was very surprised that I was not being treated. He confirmed what I read about miscarriages and also said a high TSH can cause birth defects. So, he ordered another TSH test and said he is (most likely) going to put me on meds. He wants to see my TSH below 2.5. So, I have to get the blood work done, start the meds, wait four weeks, and then get more blood work to see if the meds are working. And, once I get PG again, he will up the dose of the meds. So I'm glad we decided to go see him a bit earlier than planned, because this might take some time.
He also said that, although my cycle is back, the fact that I am still nursing could contribute to my IF by causing high prolactin levels. So he's also testing me for that. If it's normal, we might be able to start IUIs once my thyroid is under control, (but he has to do more research on clomid + nursing). Otherwise, I will have to wean DD before TTC.
Greg and I are not exactly sure when we want to go back for IUIs. Our goal is to have our children about three years apart, which would mean getting pregnant in August or September. But, we all know that you can't exactly plan when you get pregnant! I got my cycle back about 9 month ago, and we have been "not trying but not avoiding" with no success, so we are assuming we'll need to do IUIs again. The RE said he will do the exact same thing he did when I got pregnant with Lily, (which means 50mg clomid CDs 3-7) and follie checks starting on CD 9, so hopefully I will respond the same way, but you never know.
We may start as soon as March or April, or wait until after Lily's birthday. I'd really like Lily to be potty-trained before another baby arrives, but I would hate to keep waiting and then have a hard time getting PG. Hmmm....Well, in the meantime, we'll think about it and enjoy life!
